The product problem
Rathor (exported from Paperclip local project) The engineering challenge is to turn that scope into a legible system with explicit inputs, dependable workflow boundaries, and an outcome that can be inspected and maintained.
Source reviewedFull-stack ProductSource archive
Architecture knowledge graph14 connected nodes
Architecture stage Technology dependencyMove pointer to inspect depth
System brief
Full-stack Product / reviewed system architecture
- Engineering focus
- Product and systems engineering
- Domain
- Full-stack Product
- Delivery window
- Source archive
- System state
- Source reviewed
1source repositories indexed
7application packages detected
9core technologies mapped
The engineering move
Complex behavior, made operational.
The architecture decision
The reviewed implementation routes input / action through domain & workflow logic, crosses external apis & platform services where required, and produces actionable result / automated outcome.
The operating result
FBA vs FBM is included as documented engineering work. Its source structure, technology stack, and functional flow are presented here even though no verified public deployment is currently available.
Delivered capability
What the system actually does.
01
Input / Action intake and validation
02
Domain & Workflow Logic execution
03
External APIs & Platform Services integration boundary
04
Actionable Result / Automated Outcome delivery
05
Persistent data and state management
06
Containerized delivery workflow
Full system flow
The Mermaid diagram, rendered.
The interactive graph above is the executive view. This is the detailed service, data, control, and delivery path reviewed from source.Rendering the reviewed system flow
Production architecture
A concrete path through the system.
Each stage below comes from the reviewed source tree, routes, services, infrastructure, and deployment evidence.- 01Input
Input / Action
The workflow begins with a defined user, event, document, media, or service input and establishes the state required for processing.
Next.jsExpress - 02Process
Domain & Workflow Logic
Domain logic coordinates the central transformation, reasoning, automation, or product workflow behind the project.
Node.jsTypeScript - 03Integrate
External APIs & Platform Services
External APIs, model providers, storage, platform services, or host applications are kept behind an explicit integration boundary.
Tailwind CSSPrisma - 04Deliver
Actionable Result / Automated Outcome
The system returns an actionable product result, structured dataset, automated operation, or user-facing response.
RedisPlaywright
Engineering judgment
The decisions behind the delivery.
The source remains the evidence
Descriptions and architecture are grounded in the indexed repository structure, package metadata, and reviewed functional flow.
Boundaries stay explicit
Inputs, core workflow, integrations, and outcomes are separated so the system can be understood without relying on a public demo.
Deployment status is honest
No live action is displayed because a public deployment could not be verified.
Technical constellation
01Next.js02Express03Node.js04TypeScript05Tailwind CSS06Prisma07Redis08Playwright09Docker
Source evidence
The system is documented.
Source tree and architecture inventory reviewed on 2026-07-16; no public deployment verified. Its reviewed architecture and functional flow remain available without presenting an unverified public deployment.
Continue through the project archive
Next caseFigma eKhata Cloud